During the fourth industrial revolution there could be competition between science parks and innovation districts. The latter seems to be a better answer to changing demand by innovative companies and knowledge workers. However, the science park concept is not static. We think the science park has its own position amidst industrial innovation campuses and innovation districts. But (old, depreciated) science parks need to adjust to the new era. Management of science parks might find inspiration in the characteristics of innovation districts. We propose three considerations that might help science parks to remain competitive:
Consider adding housing (including an impact on service level and reachability);
Consider a shift towards multiple target groups;
Consider to lay more emphasis on community management.
Especially with regard to the first two considerations one has to keep in mind that a science park is not a closed entity. Setting out new strategies also requires a re-orientation of the position and role of science parks in their urban and regional context.
economy, innovation, Innovation districts, masterplanning, Science parks, urban development
campus, city, community Strategy, companies, competition, competitive, concept, considerations, demand, economy, housing, iadp, iasp, innovation, innovation campuses, Innovation districts, jacques van dinteren, knowledge, lessons, Management, paul jansen, progress, Science parks, target group, workers
Any services and knowledge economy includes numerous innovative companies and institutions that are engaged in research, data, knowledge and information and the acquisition and transmission thereof. For a large number of these organisations an office location is sufficient. However, when it comes to basic research – especially in terms of beta disciplines – there are often more stringent requirements. With a view to cooperation opportunities, appearance and work environment quality, some of these companies have a need for specific job site concepts that capitalize on these aspects, such as science parks and industrial campuses. Moreover, the past two decades have seen the rise of new concepts that will discussed in more detail in this paper.
campus, economy, Geen categorie, innovation, Innovation districts, masterplanning, Science parks, urban development
annexe, campus, catalyst development, companies, data, dinteren, economy, image, information, innovation districts innovation, institutions, jacques van dinteren, knowledge, real estate, requirements, research, success, trust, universities, urban development
For today’s businesses, it is crucial to work together on innovation with other firms and organisations. Technology has become so specialised that no one can afford to do everything on their own. Co-creation and co-development with partner firms, institutions and universities are essential for being successful. Most new, successful products are the result of collaborative work between engineers, marketing experts, designers and often colleagues and academics as well. The benefits are lower costs, faster time to market and higher return on investment.
In this era of technology and innovation, science and technology parks are growing in number at an increasing pace since the first one was created in the 1950s. Less well known is the development which involves medium-sized and large innovative firms establishing their own ‘science park’. We call this an industrial innovation campus.
campus, economy, Geen categorie, innovation, master planning, urban development
ambition, annexe, building, campus, catalyst development, city, companies, competition, concept planning, data, development plan, dinteren, economy, image, information, innovation districts innovation, institutions, invest, investor, jacques van dinteren, knowledge, market, marketing, Mistakes, process, project, real estate, requirements, research, services, strategy, success, trust, universities, urban, urban development